Author Archives: Russell J. Bailey
Strategies for Indivisible Injury Claims
This presentation discusses the general legal principles involved in assessing divisible and indivisible injuries, and describes recent to changes in … Read more
Posted in News
Tagged alexander kask, ashcroft v. dhaliwal, B.C. law, BC law, bilanik v. ferman, blackwater v. plint, blenkarn v. mills, Bradley v. Groves, causation, damages, demidas v. poinen, derksen v. nicholson, dholliwar v. yu, divisible injury, divisible loss, indivisible injury, indivisible loss, Julia Lauwers, khudabux v. mcclary, lakatos v. lakatos, lawsuit, le v. point, litigation, moore v. kybe, mustapha v. culligan, personal injury, ratych v. bloomer, resurfice v. hanke, Russell Bailey, schnurr v. icbc, scoates v. dermott
Leave a comment
B.C. Court Clarifies Standard of Care of Contractor Performing Work on Public Roadway- Richmond v. Channa et al, 2014 BCSC 1764
When ongoing construction impedes roadside signage, it can impact the analysis of liability when a collision occurs between motor vehicles. … Read more
Posted in Posts
Leave a comment