HISTORY | PRACTICE AREAS | LAWYER PROFILES LEGAL NEWS | PUBLICATIONS | ARTICLING

Insurance Notes Newsletters


Adobe Acrobat Reader required (Click the Date to view).





Summer 2005

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Spring 2005

 

 

 

 


 

 



December 2004

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


September 2004

 

 

 


 

 

May 2004

 

 

 

 

 


 

February 2004

 

 

 

 

 


 

September 2003

 

 

 

 

 

 


June 2003

 

 

 


March 2003

 

 


 

December 2002

 

 

 

 

CGL Insurers Ordered to Defend Defective Construction Claim: Westridge Construction v Zurich (Sask.CA); Excess Insurer Not Liable for Defence Costs: ING v Federated (Ont.CA); Apportionment of Defence Costs in Sex Abuse Claim: Sommerfield v Lombard (Ont.Sup.Ct.); Duty to Indemnify, but No Duty to Defend: BC v Surrey School District (BCCA); Mortgage Clause Trumps Material Change: RBC v State Farm (SCC (Ont)); Duty to Defend Not Triggered by Defence Allegations: Hamel v Lombard (NSCA); ‘Litigation Bad Faith’ and Repudiatory Conduct: Nelson Marketing v Royal & Sunalliance (BCSC)

 

 

Fire Statutory Condition ‘Unreasonable in its Application’: Case Comment on Marche v Halifax Ins. (SCC, NS); Fraud by Insured in Presenting Evidence of Value Defeats Entire Claim: Alavie v Chubb Ins. (Ont.CA); Misrepresentation of Accounting Controls voids Financial Bond Coverage: W.H. Stuart Mutuals v London Guarantee (Ont.CA); Fraudulent Insureds Must Repay Previous Related Claim Payments: Axa Gen’l v Gottlieb (Eng.CA); Service Contractor held to have Insurable Interest in WTC: Zurich American v ABM Industries (USCA 2nd Ct.); No Contingent Time Element Cover for Expense resulting from Supplier’s Power Interruption: Pentair v American Guarantee (USCA 8th Ct.)

 

One Year Limitation Period Applied to Liability Claims: Case Comment on Canadian Northern Shield v Demers (B.C.); Coal Dust Pollution Not Excluded under CGL: Palliser Regional School Div. v Aviva (Alta.); Undisclosed Medical Condition Voids Auto Policy: Lucow v Canadian Direct (BC); Duty to Defend Residential Schools Claims: Jesuit Fathers v Guardian (Ont.CA); Builders Risk: Faulty Design, Extra Expense, and Sue & Labour: CNR v Royal and Sunalliance (Ont.); Intentional Fire, Accidental Damage: RDL v Co-operators (Man.CA); Use or Operation of a Motor Vehicle: AXA v Dominion (Ont.CA); Duty to Defend Motions Limited to Facts Alleged: Marjak Services v ICBC (BCCA), Halifax v Innopex (Ont.CA); Unintentional Discrimination: Fraser v ING (BCHRT)



Record Punitive Damages Verdict Endorsed; Public Adjuster's Fee Allowed: 1018202 Ont. Ltd. v Hamilton Twp. Farmers Mutual (Ont.); Causal Connection requirement in Advertising Liability coverage: prairieFyre Software v St. Paul Fire & Marine (Ont.C.A.); Breach of Warranty in one Policy period; Loss after Renewal: LLA Logging v SGIO (Sask.C.A.); Materiality and Prejudice: Skuratow v Commonwealth Ins. (B.C.S.C.); Excluded Peril, or ‘Underlying State of Affairs'?: Midland Mainline v Eagle Star (Eng.C.A.)

 

Tax Gross-up and Management Fees: Case Comment on Townsend v Kroppmanns (SCC, B.C.); Limitation Period in Fire Statutory Conditions does not apply to flood claims, unless clearly provided for in policy terms: Fenrich v Wawanesa Mutual (Alta. Q.B.); Are You In, or Are You Upon? Theft from Vehicle Exclusion in a Jewellers Block policy: EMMI Inc. v Zurich American (Calif. Sup. Ct.); Patent Infringement Claims under Advertising Liability coverage: Amazon.com Int’l Inc. v American Dynasty Surplus Lines, and Autosox USA Inc. v Northern Ins. Co. (Wa.CA)

 

Duty to Defend Residential Schools Claims: Jesuit Fathers v Guardian (Ont.); ‘Professional Services’ Exclusion Encompasses Claim by Non-Client: Mantini-Atkinson v The Co-operators (Ont.); No Homeowners Coverage for Internet Defamation: Hodgkinson v Economical Mutual (Ont.C.A.); “One Cause” Found, Exclusion Applied to Successive Causation case: Algonquin Power (Long Sault) Partnership v Chubb (Ont.); Plaintiff’s Counsel Ordered to Pay Costs in Unsuccessful Bad Faith Claim: Chaplin v Sun Life (B.C.)

 

 
Creation and Waiver of Litigation Privilege: Case Comment on Ng v Royal & SunAlliance (BCSC) and Marion v Wawanesa (Alta.); Bifurcation of Bad Faith Actions: Sempecos v State Farm (Ont.CA); Defence Owed by Homeowner’s Insurers, to ‘negligent supervision’ claims in Motor Vehicle Actions: Fitzgerald v Co-operators (NSSC) and Dominion v Axa (Ont.); Jeweller’s Warranty Held Deficient: Ancaster Jewellers v Pafco (Ont.CA); Reinsurer’s Obligation to Honour Settlement: Assicur. Generali v CGU Int’l (Eng.QB)

 

 
No Coverage for Home Damaged by Foster Child: Riordan v Lombard (BCCA); E&O Claims: One Limit, or Two? How Many Deductibles?: Countrywide Assured Grp. v Marshall (Eng.CA); Subrogation, or Contribution? Pacific Forest Products v AXA Pacific (BCCA)

 

Loss of Chance in Personal Injury: Case Comment on Gregg v Scott (Eng.CA.); Mysterious Disappearance: Trenville Farms v Wawanesa (Alta.); Appraisal of Public Adjuster’s Fees: 854965 Ontario Ltd. v. Dominion (Ont.); Is it Bad Faith to Meet with your Own Expert? Continental Ins. Co. v Almassa Int’l Inc.(Ont.)


Insurers Stumble on Concrete Liability: Alie v Bertrand Frere Const. (Ont.CA); U.S. Court Limits Punitive Damages to Impact within State Border: White v Ford Motor Co. (USCA 9th Ct.); “That Particular Part”: Continental Stress Relieving Services Inc. v. CGU Canada (Alta) and Danric Const. v Cdn. Surety (BC)

 

© Copyright 2005 Guild, Yule & Company. All rights reserved.