|
Parsons v. Finch et al - A Case Moment;
Municipal and Landlord Liability for Illegal Waste Piles; Geraghty v. Port Coquitlam - A Case Comment
When do the Police have a Duty to Provide Medical Attention?;
Heritage Preservation Society of New Westminster v. NewWestminster (City) -
A Case Comment; Once a Ditch, always a Ditch? A Municipality's Power to "Change
its Mind"; Litigation Update - Small Claims Increase in Monetary Jurisdiction
Can Be Retroactive
Have the Courts Closed the Door on Summary Trial Applications to determine
Statutory Notice Defences in Multi-Party Litigation?; Osoyoos (Town) v. Rattlesnake Canyon Family
Entertainment Park Inc. [2005] B.C.J. No. 494 (S.C.) - A Case Comment; Litigation Update - Small
Claims and Supreme Court Rule 68; Update - 410727 BC Ltd. v. Dayhu Investments Ltd.
Sechelt
Seawalls by the Seashore – Discrimination and City
Planning: Moser v BCHRT; On the Right Track? The
Legal Battle Over Vancouver’s Arbutus Corridor: CPR
v Vancouver (SCC); Duddle v Vernon –
Leave to Appeal to SCC Refused
Thirty Year Limitation Period Upheld:
410727 v Richmond (BCCA); Municipality Wins Appeal
in Public Facilities Liability Case: Duddle v Vernon
(BCCA)
Summary Trials – A Means to an End?; When Does and
Athlete Become a ‘Nuisance’?: Harrison Hot
Springs v Kamenk (BCCA)
|
