• Who We Are
  • Practice Areas
    • Administrative Law
    • Banking and Lending Law
    • Commercial Law
    • Contaminated Sites Litigation
    • Construction Group
    • Corporate Law
    • Coverage
    • Education Law
    • Employment Law
    • Health Care Litigation
    • Highways Law
    • Human Rights Law
    • Insurance Law
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Maritime Law
    • Mediation and Arbitration
    • Motor Vehicle Litigation
    • Municipal Law
    • Occupiers Liability
    • Personal Injury Law
    • Product Liability
    • Professional Liability
    • Real Estate Law
    • Subrogation
    • Wills and Estates
  • Our Team
  • News & Posts
    • News
    • Posts
  • Join Us
View AWARDS & ACCOLADES
SUBSCRIBE to OUR POSTS
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
604-688-1221 2100-1075 Georgia St W
Vancouver, BC V6E 3C9
Logo
  • Contact Us

Tag Archives: dholliwar v. yu

Strategies for Indivisible Injury Claims

Posted on June 21, 2018 by Russell J. Bailey

This presentation discusses the general legal principles involved in assessing divisible and indivisible injuries, and describes recent to changes in … Read more …

Posted in News | Tagged alexander kask, ashcroft v. dhaliwal, B.C. law, BC law, bilanik v. ferman, blackwater v. plint, blenkarn v. mills, Bradley v. Groves, causation, damages, demidas v. poinen, derksen v. nicholson, dholliwar v. yu, divisible injury, divisible loss, indivisible injury, indivisible loss, Julia Lauwers, khudabux v. mcclary, lakatos v. lakatos, lawsuit, le v. point, litigation, moore v. kybe, mustapha v. culligan, personal injury, ratych v. bloomer, resurfice v. hanke, Russell Bailey, schnurr v. icbc, scoates v. dermott | Leave a comment
© 2018 Guild Yule LLP
Sitemap | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
Best Lawyers Award Badge
Website Design by Graphically Speaking